CONSULTING
For Schools and Program Providers
Program Risk Review
Review Scope and Focus
Reviews are aimed at understanding the whole risk management system and how people, policy, and structures interact with one another. The goal is to identify opportunities for improvement and strengths that can be leveraged for maximum impact. Reviews look at risk governance, like decision-making and accountability structures, and information flow, such as how expectations and changes are communicated and how feedback loops inform organizational learning.
Program Risk Reviews focus on program design, planning, and delivery practices, and how risk management is embedded throughout. This includes how policy translates into work activities, and how program and field practices compare against current accepted practices in the industry. We use human factors methods to help articulate and evaluate these processes and consider how organizational and safety culture inform these aspects.
Emergency preparation and crisis management are staples of risk reviews. We examine likely incident scenarios and potential impacts on people and the organization, communication and escalation protocols, and how the organization plans and prepares to work with and communicate with all relevant stakeholders in the event of a crisis.
Deliverables
The review concludes with a written report that provides observations and prioritized recommendations. The report includes an executive summary suitable for board presentation, a detailed analysis of the current risk management strategy, and findings with actionable recommendations organized by theme or operational area, and priorities for implementation based on risk and current capabilities.
A leadership briefing accompanies the report to support discussion, build shared understanding of findings, and establish agreement on priorities and next steps. This briefing helps translate observations into decisions and creates alignment between executive and program leadership on the path forward.
The review provides clarity about what is working well, where gaps or constraints exist, and where attention and resources should be directed. It gives organizations insight into how their system operates in practice and creates a roadmap for improvement that is grounded in evidence and realistic about context. The process builds accountability and alignment across people and systems, and improves consistency across programs.
Consulting Projects
Consulting projects are aimed at targeted improvements to an organization’s risk management plan. Recent projects have included crisis management planning and training, partner vetting, venue risk assessment, and risk management training for staff and leadership. These engagements are tailored to each organization’s context and help leaders move forward when they need specific support, a fresh perspective, or additional capacity.
Program Design
Program design helps schools and program providers build a new program offering or refine an existing one. Safety management is more effective when it is thoughtfully integrated early in the design stage, and when program goals, learning curriculum, and activities are aligned. We help on the ground and in-person, such as intensive workshops or conducting venue risk assessments, and we help remotely on specific projects like curriculum development or as an ongoing thought partner. This service is especially valuable for international schools and providers in Asia-Pacific.
Consulting Project Process
Each engagement is fit to the project and organization. Most follow this structure:
We begin by understanding your organization's context, operations, and approach to risk and safety. This phase includes a kickoff meeting, document and data review, stakeholder interviews, and site visits when appropriate. The goal is to name the problems and issues the engagement should examine and establish a shared foundation for the work ahead.
1. Discovery & Data Collection
We identify findings and craft recommendations and other deliverables, addressing specific vulnerabilities and incorporating strengths as leverage points for implementation. This involves systems mapping, pattern and theme analysis, and application of safety science frameworks such as Hierarchical Task Analysis and Net-HARMS. We test and refine key observations and understandings with leaders and staff to ensure accuracy and relevance.
2. Analysis
We finalize deliverables and develop an implementation plan, such as a roadmap, training, or presentation. The engagement includes transition support to help move from planning to implementation. This may involve presenting findings to boards or leadership teams, connecting with relevant specialists or peer networks, or providing guidance during rollout. Our goal is to build internal capability while remaining available as a resource.
3. Synthesis & Delivery
Testimonials
“I highly recommend Slay Risk for organizations seeking thorough risk analysis and meaningful capacity-building”
Stuart’s systematic approach helped us understand how to better manage risk for complex field placements. He identified and translated key risks into actionable strategies our team could implement. His approach is education-focused, and he prepared us to effectively advocate for higher-level policies at the institution.
JAYSON SEAMAN
CHAIR AND ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
DEPT. OF RECREATION MANAGEMENT & POLICY
"A thoughtful and professional approach that delivers meaningful outcomes"
Stuart's expert knowledge and ability to effectively communicate and articulate complex issues made our engagement valuable and insightful. The process was collaborative and responsive to our needs, with clear and timely communication throughout. The outcomes and deliverables were well articulated and meaningful. As a result of this engagement, we've seen improvements in leadership accountability and cross-functional collaboration. Truly a quality experience.
UNIVERSITY RISK MANAGER
FAQs
-
Let’s talk about your challenges and align the scope to your budget. Many organizations begin with a narrower review focused on a few essential areas or specific pain points, such as program planning, emergency response, or transportation planning, for example. This approach enables forward progress and leaves room to expand later when capacity allows.
-
Many risk managers want to develop their own capability to conduct internal and ongoing reviews, perform system-wide analysis, and craft recommendations for their executive leaders and board. We can structure the engagement so that you build and practice those skills while we work through your current challenges.
-
Yes, these can be done remotely. Site visits are recommended when feasible, as they provide more context and insight, and especially when operations and relationships need to be observed directly. Many engagements use a blended approach.
-
Accreditation evaluates whether your organization meets a defined set of standards. A Program Risk Review examines the effectiveness of the risk management plan, and how it actually works in practice. Although aligned with industry standards and accepted practices, risk reviews go beyond accreditation to inform overall understanding of safety context, barriers, and constraints, and targeted improvements that are fit for the organization's purpose and circumstances.
-
Yes. Organizations often use a review to prepare for accreditation or to provide evidence of due diligence to boards, executive teams, or external partners. However, the accrediting organization has the final say on which practices and evidence meets their standards.
-
We often stay engaged to help with implementation. Sometimes this involves writing a crisis management plan, updating policies, or supporting a change initiative. Other times, leaders take on the work and use coaching to navigate the internal relational aspects of their organization. When specialized expertise is needed, such as child protection, legal, insurance, or for security issues, I can connect you with trusted colleagues.
-
That’s common, you should reach out anyway. A conversation can help determine whether a review, a targeted project, or a smaller-scope engagement is the right first step. You don’t need to solve everything at once; the goal is to begin in a way that matches your needs, budget, and capacity.
Questions about a review or consulting project?
Reach out. We can talk through your challenges and help figure out the next steps, whether that leads to an engagement or not.